Wednesday, June 6, 2007

TV



Main

Research Proposal: TV and how Bad it is on Children

JUNE 20TH



Studies have shown that in the past few years, a major number of American children spent more time in front of a television set than in a classroom. Many of them were free to watch without a regulation from their parents: in fact nearly a quarter had sets in their own rooms. So what does television do to our children? Is it good or bad for children? Then how? Theses are some questions that would give a little information on TV and it effect on children. Television is one of the most significant inventions in the world it was invented by Philo Farnsworth an American inventor. However, it become as any other inventions can be use in either way the good way or the bad way. Children should be protected from watching TV programs which is include violence scenes , sex scenes, drug use and Commercials because it has a bad influence on children mentally and physically.

Do you know the average American kid set to watch TV everyday? Latest studies show that American kids spend 5 hours a day watching TV. Some of them watch TV with their parents and others watch without a parent control. Watching TV without a parent control is very dangers on children because they would be watching things that they shouldn’t watch. TV violence is one of the most dangers things to watch for children. It main influence on children is on their behavior and it effect children to make them become numb the horror of violence, accepted violence as a way to solve problems, imitate the violence that they observe on TV and make them more aggressive on violence. It doesn’t matter the age of the child, the effect is the same. 5 years old kid watching his favorite character on TV killing people, how do you think that affect him? I think it will make him think that violence is the only way to get what you want. How can we prevent violence? We can stop it by teaching our children to use word rather than actions to solve and also by reducing the violence that they witness. FACT: The average American child will have watched 100,000 acts of televised violence, including 8000 depictions of murder, by the time he or she finishes sixth grade (approximately 13 years old).


The number of scenes on US TV featuring sex has nearly doubled in the last seven years according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. A number of studies have shown the dramatic effect that television and music have on young people's attitudes and beliefs. Broadcast television and popular music have become far more explicit in recent years, with the 8 p.m. hour of prime time viewing (the "family hour") containing an average of more than eight sexual incidents. A study called Sex on TV, released in 2001 by the Kaiser Family Foundation, found that the number of programs with sexual content increased from about 50% of all shows in the 1997/98 television season to 66% in the 1999/2000 season.

Families have to take care of their children by control what they watch on TV. However, it’s not the only families responsibility, it also the media too or people who control or choose what appear on TV and what shouldn’t. 56% of children ages 8-16 have a television in their rooms (Annenberg Public Policy Center, 2000. Media in the Home 2000) this is a huge number that would make people recognize how dangers are TV on children 57% of children in United States has television in their rooms. So they watch TV alone with doors looked and that mean they watch anything they want.


According to MELISSA DITTMANN, “advertising industry spends $12 billion per year on ads targeted to children, bombarding young audiences with persuasive messages through media such as television and the Internet”. The average child is exposed to more than 40,000 TV commercials a year, according to studies. And ads are reaching children through new media technologies and even in schools--with corporate-sponsored educational materials and product placements in students' textbooks. So how that effect children? The immediate effect is the child would have the desire to have that product, no matter what that product stand for. Some other influenced the child behavior like if a kid see an ad about healthy food and then he viewed another ad about snack or junk food the first ad wouldn’t be effective any more. Indeed, some researchers speculate that advertising geared to children--who largely consist of ads for sugary cereals, candy and fast-food restaurants--may be contributing to the increase in childhood obesity by promoting unhealthy foods. Plus, studies suggest that eating habits formed during childhood can persist throughout life. Actually it’s one of the most important reasons of child obesity. Children can’t stand watching theses thing on TV and they immediately start to ask their parents to buy theses things regardless what that thing stand for and the kid use others techniques like refuse to eat anything than the product that his convinced the kid . The companies who put theses ads on the TV know that children are an easy target to get their attention. Also adult Commercials have a bad influence on children imagine that a tiny percentage among the 40,000 Commercials per year are selling unhealthy stuff like beer. They introduce beer as a cool thing and it make people cool, so the children get that beer equal cool and if you want to be cool you have to drink beer.

The next step of my research will be reading some books that have something with my research. I already have a list of the books that I’m going to read beside books that I already took a like it them. Also I’ll interview some people who have an experience with children and television and I’ll ask them some questions such as how TV affects your life? Is TV harm on children? And others. I may also talk to psychologist who has an experience with children got effected by TV and about that I have done some research to find a psychologist specialist in children and a sent some emails to some of psychologist furthermore I’m waiting for a response. In addition I’ll search for victims of TV violence and see how TV made them victims. Moreover I will use some databases including Kluwer Online, LexisNexis Academic (Thomson Gale), and Academic Search Premier (Ebsco). so far I have write down a plan for my research process, first for the next couple days I will read some books and read other stuff like from the internet, so I would be knowing a little more information because the next thing will be interviewing some people and I have to be ready to ask them, so hopefully by the next week I’ll be finished from talking to people who I’m going to interview. After that I’ll narrow me thinking little bet , so I could focus more within a specific thing .I think all that will give me a full idea on what I’m going to do, so after that I will start writing my research with confident that I’m ready to do so.

In fact I’m doing this research because I think what I’m seeing on TV now days is a crime on childhood of any child and we have to do anything that can help as people because the same thing could happen to my children in the future and I know that most people have no idea about how that could effect children through out their life. So I felt like I have to do something, so I decided to go deep in the subject and whenever I read something on my subject I feel like that what should I write about. My main goal is to persuade families who have children and they don’t know how bad TV is, so they can take care of their children to reduce the harm of television and also for families who know, but they don’t take as a series thing. Protect children everywhere is what me focusing on and hoping that my research would be a reason to protect at least one child from TV.

In conclusion TV has not just become a TV where children enjoyed watching for fun it becomes a thing where children learn from new things. It’s not a bad idea to learn from TV. However, the problem is that we can’t decide or control what should children to watch and what’s not. TV has a bad effect on children specially programs that content violence, sex, drug scenes, and commercials.



Work cited


MELISSA DITTMANN. Protecting children from advertising .Monitor on psychology .Volume 35, No. 6 June 2004. .

Annotated Bibliography

JULY 19TH

Books sources:

Gunter, Barrie. Violence on television: distribution, form, context, and themes. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
Barrie Gunter focuses in his book on VIOLNCE on TV. He divided his book into different chapters and one of the chapters is talking specifically about children and violence on television. This’s including things like violence on programs involving children and how it affects them. Also he mentions the amount of violence in television in United States. In addition to all of that he mention that tv violence has a strong related crimes in a society.
Evaluation: this book is a creditable source for some reasons. First the author is a professor who has an interest in researching on TV impact in general for a long time. He has spent a lot of time on researching for many years. Second, this book was based on a deep research by a team of researchers who spent years doing their research. Finally, this is a great source because it contains a lot of facts that are related to my narrowed topic.
(2) Children and media violence: yearbook from the UNESCO International Clearinghouse on Children and Violence on the Screen. Goteborg: The UNESCO International Clearinghouse on Children and Violence on the Screen, 1998.

This book was published by the UNESCO international clearinghouse on children and violence on the screen nordicom. This book focused on many things in the media and one of the things is television violence and children. They gave some background information about children and television violence in the United States and some facts in the introduction, and then talked about a study made by the NTVS national television violence. In addition the book provided a research on the influences of television violence. Also this provided an article about we do we watch television violence.
Evolution; this book is an excellent source because it was published by one of the most important organizations in world which is UNESCO specialized agency of the UN. Also Children and the media violence book is good source because it presented the subject in different ways by different authors. In fact this source has a lot of interesting things that would help me development my research.

Article sources:

(1)TV violence and kids." Education Digest 62.1 (Sep. 1996): 23. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. [Library name], [City], [State abbreviation]. 11 July 2007. <http://0-search.ebscohost.com.skyline.cudenver.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=9610010321&site=ehost-live>.
This article is about a study made by the national television violence. This study was to see if TV violence exists and if it does in which amount. The study monitored programs from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., seven days of the week, yielding about 119 hours per channel. Some 2,500 hours of programming were examined, including 2,693 programs; 384 of these were reality-based shows. Furthermore this article contains results which were based on monitored programs. Also it gave some tips or recommendations to televisions industry, and parents.
Evaluation: this article is a good source because it gives some information about a study made by a special organization. Also it’s an interesting source because it has mentioned something about TV industry and most what I found has related things with the victims who are the kids.

(2)Laura Outerbridge. “TV's lesson: kick first; talk later - TV violence and children”. Insight on the News. March 25, 1996.

This article by Laura Outerbridge talked about the worried about violent TV programs on children by parents. In her article she expresses the parents concern on the effect of violent TV programs in life where she divided it to short term effect and long term effect. In addition she comments on some solutions that has not solved the problem completely. In the end she gives some new solutions that might help to make children believe that violence is the right thing to get what they want.

Evaluation

This article which, was written by Laura Outerbridge is a great source for many reasons. First, in her article she talked about how parents feel about their children watching TV violence and their point of view. Second, this provided information about long term effect which couldn’t find before. Finally, she discussed what psychologists are thinking about TV effect on children which would help me in talking about the health of children and TV violence effect on it.

(3) Fields, Suzanne. "TV violence minus context numbs kids' sense of ethics. (Column)." Insight on the News 9.n31 (August 2, 1993): 31(2). InfoTrac OneFile. Thomson Gale. Auraria Library. 12 July 2007
<http://0-find.galegroup.com.skyline.cudenver.edu:80/itx/infomark.do?&contentSet=IAC-Documents&type=retrieve&tabID=T003&prodId=ITOF&docId=A14466765&source=gale&userGroupName=auraria_main&version=1.0>.


In this article which was written by Suzanne Fields, she talked about violence as kinds and she classified them to different parts. Then she mentions that violence gain new way and it effect on men, women, and children could be stronger. In addition to that she talked about the major TV network and how they promised to do their best to notice parents about programs that contain violent and to put notice in newspapers and magazines so parents could avoid their children to watch theses programs
Evaluation: this source is credible source because the author is an experience person who has a PhD and well known writer in some of the biggest newspaper in the United States. Also this article is a perfect article that can be used in any academic purposes. It is an interesting source because it focused on things that related to my narrowed research topic.

Website sources:

(1)Ron Kaufman “TV violence and children. “ < http://www.turnoffyourtv.com/healtheducation/violencechildren/violencechildren.html.

This website has a lot of information about TV violence and children which mainly focuses on how bad TV it is. This website content information which’s include facts about children and how they get affected, statistics on children, and point of view of the health on TV affect on children. Also this website analyzed TV where the writer called TV as a world of good and bad which mean that TV is not bad at all. However, it contain such bad things and that what people against TV are trying to clean up .The thing that I liked in this website is amount of information

Evaluation:

It is creditable website because it was written by an author who seems to have knowledge on the topic. Also he has a well informed website with as much as you want from information supported by studies and opinions from people with knowledge about the subject. Also I found in his website a radio where you can listen to talk show with more than 30 topics related to TV violence.


(2)Kevin Szaflik. “ Violence on TV: The Desensitizing Of America”
http://www.ridgenet.org/szaflik/tvrating.htm .

This website provides a research by author Kevin Szaflik. In his website he addressed his main ideas in five things. First he talked about the effect and here he mention that the most notable effect is going to be on kids behavior and their aggressiveness. Second, he named television as a babysitter where children learn behavior from as a replacement to quality time with parents. Third, he discussed why is three violence in television, fourth, The V Chip is a way to preventing from viewing violence. The V chip is a device that can block transmission of violent programs into homes. Finally, he gave another solution which is TV rating system.

Evaluation

This website is a good source because it was written by in academic person who wrote it with well format. Also this website has some information that match with my ideas. In addition to that this website has many helpful things.

Other sources

(1)Maurine Doerken. Classroom combat: teaching and television. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications, c1983.

This book which was written by Maurine Doerken is focusing mainly on how television influence on young people’s learning. It covers what children learn from television, how they learn, and how it effects their development education. In addition to that the author covered topics like how TV affects brain, and emotional and psychological growth of children.

This book is credible source because it has the point of view from education person about TV and how it affects children. The author of this book is a teacher, she spent a lot of time watching young students behavior and learning abilities and how related to watching television. This source is related to my research question in the way of giving reasons why children should be protected from watching TV. In addition this source is an interesting one because it provided some information about young students learning abilities.



(2)Media source.

Television Violence and other Violence in the media. Anthony Simonetti.

This video was created by Anthony Simonetti. in his video at firs, he show a speech was given by Hilary Clinton, she talked about violence in media and how better parents should be to protect their children and also she mentioned that we should find new way rather than old ways of solution and to go beyond theses things. Furthermore he showed a part of a TV show talk and how some people in the media are trying to fight against people who are fighting to protect children. Then he talked about what should the government and also the parents.

Evolution: this source is a credible source because what in this video some speeches are from people with a high position in their life. Also he brought things that were broadcasting on TV cable. Also this video will help me because it gives a lot of question mark that would make think to answer them which means more knowledge for me.

Final Paper TV violence and Children

AUGUST 3
Children usually spend their time with many types of media, including computer, music, video games, videotapes, and television. Although television is most common used medium, viewing time varies with age. The average American kid set to watch television everyday is from four to five hours a day. although some studies suggests that children two years and older shouldn’t watch more than two hours of TV a day and children under two years shouldn’t have TV time at all according to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).
Have you ever thought about violence programs on television and how they could affect children? Television is one of the most significant inventions in the world it was invented by Philo Farnsworth an American inventor. Television is always a debatable subject since it was invented. TV violence has been a huge impact on children since its early days starting with Superman or a Mouseketeer and passing through Ninja Turtles on Harley’s, Power Rangers until today's life with Family Guy. It impact on children could be seen in many ways, such as in a child’s, behavior and how aggressive a child becomes, in how a child becomes less sensitive to the pain and suffering of others, and in how children become more fearful of the world around them . In fact it's our responsibility to protect our children from TV dangerous and we could do it by shearing the responsibility between parents, TV industry and policymakers and missing someone of them would lead to incomplete solution or would help children for short period of time.

Television violence causes negative behavior in children, however; television can be a powerful influence to young viewers in our society. Unfortunately, much of today’s television programming is very violent. Many researchers like scientists, pediatricians, and child researchers in many countries have studied to find out what it is about television violence that makes it such a big affect on the way kids act and behave. Sometimes, children think that is a normal thing in our real life, by watching only a single violent program, which can increase aggressiveness on children and become violent, aggressive, and vicious.
Watching violence programs on television affect children behavior and make them become more aggressive. In addition 15 years study that use released by researcher from university of Michigan has shown that children who watch violent TV shows in their childhood are most likely turn out to become aggressive adults.

According to Lauren Outerbridge who wrote in her article “kick first talk later”, “Mighty Morphin Power Rangers is the most violent program ever produced for young children, averaging 200 acts of violence per hour, according to Lebo and Keiser. Tellingly, "children committed seven times as many acts of aggression in play after viewing one episode of the Power Rangers show, as compared to children who didn't see the show."

So that just an example of what could a violent program could do to children and how fast and easy children could get affected. From my own experience with children and how aggressive they got after watching a single violent act, I have witnessed my nephew several times and I discovered that he immediately after watching a violent act like kicking he respond by doing the same act and try to hit his little sister.

In an article by Barbara J. Wilson, she analyses the part of rewards and punishments in television violence and she came out with that “violence that glamorized or rewarded poses a risk for viewers, but so does violence that simply goes unpunished. Studies show that rewarded violence or violence that is not overtly punished encourages the learning of aggressive attitudes and behaviors (Bandura, 1965; Bandura, Ross, & Ross, 1961, 1963; Paik& Comstock, 1994). In contrast, portrayals of punished violence can decrease the chances that viewers will learn aggression rewards and punishments can influence audience fear as well. Viewers who watch violence go unpunished are more anxious and more pessimistic about the consequences of real life violence (Bryant, Carveth, & Brown, 1981).


Children may become less sensitive to the pain and suffering of others. Viewing violence encourages children to see other people as enemies rather than as individuals with thoughts and feelings like themselves. Children who cannot put themselves in others' shoes may become less desirable playmates. One perfect example that supports this idea is the Columbine High School tragedy in which two young men opened fire, detonated bombs, and killed several school mates and teachers. Two of the many causes for their rampage were watching the movie the Matrix and not feeling any remorse for their predicted actions. Because the boys were so used
To witnessing violence in television, movies, and games, they did not pity the people they were going to hurt. Also, some people argue that TV violence only reflects on our society and is okay to watch. Children model both the positive and negative behaviors that they see, so since parents are their children's most important teachers, they need to regulate the period of time a child watches TV. Children watching violent television view the acceptance of aggressive behavior, even if this aggressive behavior is performed by the good guys. Children learn that the way to resolve conflict is through fighting. Children need to learn that violence is not the preferred
Method of conflict resolution. Parents of today need to take a more active role in teaching their children how to resolve conflict and to get along with others.

According to a study by national television violence “Negative consequences of violence are not often portrayed. Most violent portrayals do not show the victim experiencing any serious physical harm or pain at the time the violence occurs: 47 percent of violent interactions show no harm to victims; 58 percent show no pain. Only 16 percent of all programs portray long-term negative repercussions of violence, such as psychological, financial, or emotional harm”. Actually that appear to be a real and that why children get the idea that violence doesn’t hurt for example in Columbus, Ohio, a fourteen years old boy killed his younger brother when trying to reproduce a scene from “ dirty Harry” he had seen on TV. The fourteen years old didn’t realize that the bullet coming from his father’s gun was “for real” because he thought it wouldn’t harm as he seen on TV. as a matter of fact children are getting the idea since their early years that violence does not hurt through what they watch in their everyday life and it as it appear that more 50% of the time those programs don’t show any kind of pain, which has a huge impact on children feeling of pain.

Also according to the same study by national television violence has found that Television violence is usually not explicit or graphic. Most is presented without any close-up focus on aggressive behaviors and without showing any blood and gore. Less than 3 percent of violent scenes feature close-ups on the violence; only 15 percent contain blood and gore. Explicit or graphic violence contributes to desensitization and can enhance fear. That is why young people don’t think that violence does hurt they knew by what they watch that in most scenes people who get attacked didn’t feel any pain in most cases specially the main character of the TV program. Even good guys in television programs when you watch them in violent actions they most time got attacked by group of bad guys, but the good guys always beat the bad guys regardless of how hard is it to do so in real life and for adults they already knew that is just a something that can’t happen in real time. However, for kids it could be for them a reflect to the real life because their brain development is still not completed and everything for them is acceptable.

Children become more fearful of the world around them. Did you know that children programs on television contain five times more violence than the average prime time hour? Children's natural anxieties may become magnified by watching TV in which the world is a dangerous place where violence triumphs over peace. Since a child's mind is still developing during his early years, watching too much television may limit his potential by confusing him about what is right, wrong, or fake.

Maurine Doerken in her book teaching and television” has mentioned a study by a communication theorist George Gerbner that says “George Gerbner believes excessive violence on TV may give viewers what he calls a “mean-world syndrome.” In other words, they see the aggressive TV content and take it as an indication that the world in general is a hostile and unpleasant place. Or, they may even become fearful of life itself and going outside. Indeed, Gerbner has discovered that people who watch over four hours of TV each day do in fact think the world is more dangerous than light viewers …” children can get affected easily and that is because of their innocent and they believe in anything like if they saw a program and the actor died in scene, they didn’t realize that the same actor will appear again in different program. However, they will think that the actor is died for good.

Moreover Maurine Doerken in her book “teaching and television” gives some examples about how television violence has affected young people such as, nine years old boy was afraid to show his father his report card because of all the bad marks. The boy told his father they should give his teacher a box of poisoned candy for Christmas the boy’s comment, it’s easy . . . they did it on television last week.. A man wanted to kill his wife, so he gave her candy with poison in it, and she didn’t know who did it.”

One might object here that television violence has nothing to do with the children negative behavior and that negative behavior is coming from something else and what have been broadcasting is reflecting the life of American, which means that television does not create new ideas or create the violence. In addition arguing that feeling less sensitive to the pain is a cause of television violence and that is untrue claim. Furthermore the life of American and the crime rates are responsible for the fearful of children from the world around their, but Responding to these claims would be by giving an example of an incident that happened in 1979 a 16 years old school girl, Brenda Spicer, was apprehended in January, 1979, for killing two people and wounding eight with a gun. It was reported that Brenda liked watching violent TV programs and seeing people get shot. Also Arguing that feeling less sensitive to the pain is a cause of television violence, is untrue claim and all researchers have agree that feeling less sensitive is a cause of watching violence on television. Even though the crime in United States might has a connected with fearful of children, it appear from children researchers through out the years that TV has become a nightmare for children who watch violence programs.


In conclusion, television violence huge effect on children has become a fact. The most noticeable effects on children are on children behavior and aggressiveness, on children less sensitive of pain and suffering of others, and how screed children are from the world around them. I believe that children are being targeting from an invisible force and it main goal is to make those children fall in love with violence programs because people who produce those kind of programs didn’t just throw their money in air and wait to see if those children would like their programs. However they knew exactly what children are attracted to. Protecting children from television violence and it effect is a duty and everyone must do something to protect them. Industry, policymakers, and parents are responsible for finding solutions to help children and missing one part of those three wouldn’t help finding an absolute solution, so working with each other would be the best for all parties. Finally feeling that children been the only victims of television violence is what made me decide to write a research paper on television and children.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Work citation

Barrie, Gunter. Violence on television: distribution, form, context, and themes. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 2003.

Children and media violence: yearbook from the UNESCO International Clearinghouse on Children and Violence on the Screen. Goteborg: The UNESCO International Clearinghouse on Children and Violence on the Screen, 1998.

Doerken, Maurine. Classroom combat: teaching and television. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications, c1983.

Kaufman, Ron. “TV violence and children’’. “Turn off your TV”. 2004.
http://www.turnoffyourtv.com/healtheducation/violencechildren/violencechildren.html.

Outerbridge, Laura. “TV's lesson: kick first; talk later - TV violence and children”. Insight on the News. March 25, 1996.

.">TV violence and kids." Education Digest 62.1 (Sep. 1996): 23. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO.